Talk:Generational Tension
Discussion: | This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Generational Tension article. Please observe archival neutrality standards and cite 1976 primary state files. |
Infobox parameters and classification[edit]
Proposal: merge the "The marks of the young" paragraph into Music, where the same material appears in more detail. The present split is useful for readers searching by institution, but it duplicates about three sentences.
— M. Dragova (talk | contribs) August 1978 (UTC)
Copy-edit of the opening[edit]
The "The plan generation" section reads well, but it assumes the reader knows the difference between the coast and the interior. A one-sentence gloss with a link to Music would help.
— Archival_Reviewer_76 (talk | contribs) February 1980 (UTC)
Missing link to Socialist Moravska[edit]
The current wording is too close to the Ministry circular. I have added an attributed paraphrase and a link to Socialist Moravska. Please review before the next archive sync.
— Nikola_Vranov (talk | contribs) August 1980 (UTC)
Disagreement over the lead paragraph[edit]
The infobox has no entry for the plan generation. Is this deliberate? The 1976 ministry circular reproduced in Settlement and custom in the Zala valley says otherwise, and Svetla Radulova follows the circular.
— Nikola_Vranov (talk | contribs) February 1982 (UTC)
Missing link to Child-Rearing and Academies[edit]
Copy-edit: the "The plan generation" section mixes British and American spelling in the same paragraph. I suggest we standardise on the archive's 1976 house style and keep quoted titles as they appear in the original.
— James_Cornwell (talk | contribs) March 1983 (UTC)
Merge proposal with Child-Rearing and Academies[edit]
Copy-edit: the "The three generations" section mixes British and American spelling in the same paragraph. I suggest we standardise on the archive's 1976 house style and keep quoted titles as they appear in the original.
— Branch_Archivist (talk | contribs) March 1984 (UTC)